<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The U.S. Army Studies NLOS-LS Failures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/land_forces/the-u-s-army-studies-nlos-ls-failures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/the-u-s-army-studies-nlos-ls-failures/</link>
	<description>Your Source for Defense and Military News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:18:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Year In Defense &#124; Post-NLOS Cancellation, AETF Evaluates M777A2 for Precision Fires</title>
		<link>http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/the-u-s-army-studies-nlos-ls-failures/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>The Year In Defense &#124; Post-NLOS Cancellation, AETF Evaluates M777A2 for Precision Fires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearindefense.com/?p=1887#comment-166</guid>
		<description>[...] been introduced into the AETF to provide the unit with “precision fires” capabilities in the aftermath of the Non Line of Sight Launch Systems (NLOS-LS) cancellation. One of the M777A2s added to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been introduced into the AETF to provide the unit with “precision fires” capabilities in the aftermath of the Non Line of Sight Launch Systems (NLOS-LS) cancellation. One of the M777A2s added to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Year In Defense &#124; Navy &#8220;Assessing Alternatives&#8221; After Army Cancels NLOS-LS</title>
		<link>http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/the-u-s-army-studies-nlos-ls-failures/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>The Year In Defense &#124; Navy &#8220;Assessing Alternatives&#8221; After Army Cancels NLOS-LS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 11:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearindefense.com/?p=1887#comment-165</guid>
		<description>[...] the Army’s NLOS-LS program cancellation had been anticipated by some, one issue that has remained slightly clouded since mid-May involves impact on the U.S. Navy’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Army’s NLOS-LS program cancellation had been anticipated by some, one issue that has remained slightly clouded since mid-May involves impact on the U.S. Navy’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Year In Defense &#124; The U.S. Army Studies NLOS-LS Failures -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/the-u-s-army-studies-nlos-ls-failures/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Year In Defense &#124; The U.S. Army Studies NLOS-LS Failures -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearindefense.com/?p=1887#comment-164</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by The Year In Defense. The Year In Defense said: The U.S. Army Studies NLOS-LS Failures - http://bit.ly/c5Nj0Z [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by The Year In Defense. The Year In Defense said: The U.S. Army Studies NLOS-LS Failures &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/c5Nj0Z" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/c5Nj0Z</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

