<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FNH USA Responds to End of SOCOM SCAR Mk 16 Procurement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/defense_wide/fnh-usa-responds-to-end-of-socom-scar-mk-16-procurement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/fnh-usa-responds-to-end-of-socom-scar-mk-16-procurement/</link>
	<description>Your Source for Defense and Military News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:18:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal Palma</title>
		<link>http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/fnh-usa-responds-to-end-of-socom-scar-mk-16-procurement/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal Palma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearindefense.com/?p=3064#comment-220</guid>
		<description>FNH has done a great job with the SCAR program and they&#039;ve managed to produce an excellent family of weapons. However, the question  - what benefit will another 5.56 mm platform bring to the table - remains, a valid argument when diminishing budgets require a more thoughtful allocation of funds. The answer is none. FNH will face other challenges that will influence the MK17 SCAR. USSOCOM is composed of SOF units from all of the services. The U.S. Army SOF is the largest subset.
As you know, the U.S. Army has standardized on the KAC M110 SASS (Knight&#039;s Armament Company, Vero Beach, FL) as their 7.62 platform, of choice, for sniper application. What benefit does the SCAR MK17 deliver over the KAC M110 SASS - probably not a great deal, and for that matter what, significant benefit, does the MK17 bring over the SR25 that has been in use by the U.S. Navy for quite some time -all good questions that SOCOM has to answer.
With competing priorities for budget dollars, there must be a  compelling benefit to justify those funds.
This is a story that will unfold over time but it merits following.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FNH has done a great job with the SCAR program and they&#8217;ve managed to produce an excellent family of weapons. However, the question  &#8211; what benefit will another 5.56 mm platform bring to the table &#8211; remains, a valid argument when diminishing budgets require a more thoughtful allocation of funds. The answer is none. FNH will face other challenges that will influence the MK17 SCAR. USSOCOM is composed of SOF units from all of the services. The U.S. Army SOF is the largest subset.<br />
As you know, the U.S. Army has standardized on the KAC M110 SASS (Knight&#8217;s Armament Company, Vero Beach, FL) as their 7.62 platform, of choice, for sniper application. What benefit does the SCAR MK17 deliver over the KAC M110 SASS &#8211; probably not a great deal, and for that matter what, significant benefit, does the MK17 bring over the SR25 that has been in use by the U.S. Navy for quite some time -all good questions that SOCOM has to answer.<br />
With competing priorities for budget dollars, there must be a  compelling benefit to justify those funds.<br />
This is a story that will unfold over time but it merits following.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Oldham (Editor)</title>
		<link>http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/fnh-usa-responds-to-end-of-socom-scar-mk-16-procurement/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Oldham (Editor)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearindefense.com/?p=3064#comment-219</guid>
		<description>People will be debating the merits and the failings of the M16/M4 until doomsday, and you won&#039;t convince any of the true believers either way, but I can&#039;t forget the comment of one soldier who said something along the lines of: &quot;I feel like I&#039;m going to war with a varmint rifle.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People will be debating the merits and the failings of the M16/M4 until doomsday, and you won&#8217;t convince any of the true believers either way, but I can&#8217;t forget the comment of one soldier who said something along the lines of: &#8220;I feel like I&#8217;m going to war with a varmint rifle.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pampley</title>
		<link>http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/fnh-usa-responds-to-end-of-socom-scar-mk-16-procurement/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Pampley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearindefense.com/?p=3064#comment-218</guid>
		<description>I agree that our smaller units with lighter firepower need a new assault rifle that will allow our special forces to engage targets at greater ranges while still being effective. The military has now recognized that our forces operating in areas such as Iraq and Afganistan need the extra firepower that will allow smaller units to be more effective against larger numbers insurgents. This will in turn allow our forces the safety of distance while giving them the firepower to engage larger targets with the effectiveness of a larger unit. I agree that a new weapon is needed for our special forces units.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that our smaller units with lighter firepower need a new assault rifle that will allow our special forces to engage targets at greater ranges while still being effective. The military has now recognized that our forces operating in areas such as Iraq and Afganistan need the extra firepower that will allow smaller units to be more effective against larger numbers insurgents. This will in turn allow our forces the safety of distance while giving them the firepower to engage larger targets with the effectiveness of a larger unit. I agree that a new weapon is needed for our special forces units.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

